Answer:
People would support the economy through purchases of more goods and services.
Explanation: I JUST KNOW!!!
Answer:
d. the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon.
Explanation:
Tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: The term tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon is also referred to as TOT, and is described as the process of a person to fail in retrieving a specific term or word from the memory, along with the partial recall and feeling of retrieval being imminent.
In other words, the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon is a person's subjective feeling of being confident enough to know a particular piece of information instead of not able to recall the word correctly. Hence the person can recall a similar word from the memory yet not the exact word or information.
In the question above, Mickey is experiencing the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon.
I'd say Yes, but no at the same time. Because the Islamic's wanted to expand onto Christian Territory so there was always a tension, with the crusades and all. For The Holy Land!
One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.
