The Supreme Court case that upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases was Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Hence, the correct statement is option C.
<h3>What happened in the case of Wainwright and Arizona?</h3>
In this case, the Supreme Court declared that the Fourteenth Amendment creates a right for criminal defendants who cannot pay for their own lawyers to have state-appointed attorneys on their behalf.
The missing information is given below:
A. Baker v. Carr (1962) and Engel v. Vitale (1962)
B. Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) and Roe v. Wade (1973)
C. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966)
D. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) and Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)
Hence, The Supreme Court case that upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases was Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966). the correct statement is option C.
learn more about case of Wainwright and Arizona:
brainly.com/question/10320938
#SPJ1
Answer:
As the branch most responsive to the will of the people (who elect its members), Congress has the power to pass laws, declare war, ratify treaties, and levy taxes. The executive branch conducts foreign affairs and commands the armed forces.
Explanation:
Answer: the south
Explanation:
When america was first founded, the south was used for resources on farms and plantations and the north was more industrialized, using factories and such to make different products. Due to the fact that plantations are very large plots of land and the south had a high demand for different resources such as cotton and rice, the owners needed help and so they used slaves to do their work. Being that slaves were treated like property, they were paid either very poorly or not at all so it ended up giving the land owners a huge profit. They make a lot of money from their products and they don't spend it on paying workers. Therefore, if slavery was abolished, the owners would not fulfill the demand of the people and they cannot work efficiently on the large plot of land by themselves, which would lead to a large drop in personal income.