Answer:
Chief Justice Roger Taney declared Missouri Compromise to be illegal and unconstitutional.
Explanation:
The Missouri Compromise seen was a crucial agreement to balance the power in Congress between slave and free states. The purpose of the Missouri Compromise was to settle the dispute. As a result, it banned slavery in the north (Louisiana territory) from the southern line of latitude 36 degrees 30'. It was during The Dred Scott v. Sandford judgment by the Supreme Court found that the Missouri Compromise was illegal. Roger Taney affirmed that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional because Congress had no authority to forbid slavery in territories. To justify his statement, he mentions about the Fifth Amendment that gives citizens (slave master) a right to have property rights.
Answer:
Emerson meant that society limits people and imprisons them within a false collectivity.
Explanation:
A joint-stock company is a type of company where the responsibility of the share price is limited to each member, therefore, each member, in this case, partner, has limited freedom, but works in cooperation so that the company is successful .
When Emerson compares society to this type of company, he means that society limits all members based on a false social collectivity, imposed by the family, the community, friends and other things. In order to remain well in this type of society, individuals cannot think for themselves, but act together so that society does not get lost, even if this goes against the personal wishes and desires of each one.
D.
Continuity planning allows for operations to continue in the face of disaster.
Yes It is Japan that is their culture
The answer is a gradual adjustment. The gradual adjustment as per described by oberg is the stage of culture shock the expatriate and his or her family members come to comprehend and forecast patterns of behavior, use the language, compact with daily activities, and assent their new life. In addition, as described by oberg, biculturalism denotes to the stage in culture shock in which the manager and family members nurture to assent and appreciate local people and practices and is able to function efficiently in two principles.
