The investor will show a capital loss of $155.
We gather the following information from this question:
Pop of the fund three years ago : $12
NAV of the fund three years ago : $11.50
Current Pop : $11
Current NAV : $10.45
Number of shares : 100 shares.
We need to calculate capital loss or gain on the 100 shares in the mutual fund.
While taking the cost per unit, <u>we need to consider the public-offer-price (pop) into consideration, since an investor can only buy the shares at pop</u>.
Similarly, while selling the shares, the <u>shareholder can liquidate his position by selling back to the mutual fund at the NAV prevailing at the end of the business day</u> on which he wants to sell.
So, the formula to calculate capital gain or loss is:



Lonnie Johnson had an illustrious career as a nuclear engineer working on the Galileo space programme and the stealth bomber - but he is best known for creating a water pistol.
Hope this helped!
Good luck :p
~Emmy <3
Answer:
Proportion of sales of each department.
Explanation:
Advertising expense directly effects the sales of the business. As the campaign is made store-wide sales and it does not directly traceable to any specific department. It need proper basis for allocation of expenses. The proportion of sales of each department is the most suitable basis from all of the given options because the share of benefit from the campaign is received in the form of sale. A campaign might mostly effects the sales.
Answer:
“Should” or “should not” depend on the cost rate of the option and the risk appetite of investors.
Explanation:
An option is a contract that allows investors to buy or sell instruments such as security, Exchanged Traded Fund or an index at a pre-determined price over a certain period of time.
If the option will cost the investor an additional $10,000 and it is the cost for an option of $10 million investment, then it cost only 0.1% additionally, but it can secure the position of this investment; then the investor should buy this option.
Vice versa, if the additional $10,000 is much more than expected profit, and even lower but significantly drop down the total profit of an investment; and the investor always wish to have a high profit regardless high risk; then he shouldn’t buy this option.
Answer:
Fiedler's contingency theory of leadership effectiveness.
Explanation:
Fiedler's contingency theory of leadership effectiveness states that one's effectiveness as a leader is determined by how leadership can match the situation at hand.
There is no single best way to lead, but leadership style is determined by the situation.
According to Fiedler's contingency theory of leadership effectiveness, leadership style is fixed and leaders will need to be put into situations that best matches their style.
The two important factors to consider in thos theory are leadership style and situational favourableness.