Answer:
Option A. It will lower its costs through economies of scale.
Explanation:
The reason is that the sales of both of the companies will increase and cost can be controlled by integration of departments like finance department, distribution department, etc. This will decrease the cost of the product which will be because of higher sales and cost benefits due to integration of department and this higher sales increases the production which reduces the cost. So the option A is correct.
Answer:
$50? ($150 is not the correct answer)
Explanation:
Answer:
brainstorming method i choose this because no one can judge on what i suggest because sometimes i feel so underestimated
Answer:
Debit: $300
Credit: $300
Explanation:
See attached picture for explanation.
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
