Answer:
a) The correlation coeffcient is given by:
And replacing we got:
b) For this case we can conclude that we have a strong, negative linear association between the two stock prices.
Explanation:
Part a
For this case we have the following info:
represent the sample deviation for the variable X
represent the sample deviation for the variable Y
represent the covariance between the variables X and Y
The correlation coeffcient is given by:
And replacing we got:
Part b
Describe the relationship between prices of these two stocks.
For this case we can conclude that we have a strong, negative linear association between the two stock prices.
Answer:
Product placement.
Explanation:
Product placement is a type of marketing technique that is used by various organizations to promote their products without a clear reference to the product. This is done by paying some amount of money for these products to be shown in films and television programmes.
Product placement is carried out to generate a form of positive feelings towards the product being advertised. It enables the potential customers viewing the advert to develop a stronger bond with the brand company.
Answer: the answer is confrontation
Explanation:
Confrontation is a style of conflict resolution whereby all the conflicting groups brings all the issues in the open in an attempt to resolve the conflict.
Its is most effective when the groups need to cooperate to get the jib done effectively and there is a maximum level of trust among the group.
Answer:
It will take 2.72 years and 32.64 months.
Explanation:
Future value is the sum of principal amount and compounded interest amount invested on a specific rate for a specific period of time.
Use following formula to calculate the time period.
FV = PV x ( 1+ r )^n
FV = Future value = $6,000
PV = Present Value = $4,000
r = rate of interest = 15% yearly = 15% / 12 = 1.25%
n = time period = ?
$6,000 = $4,000 x ( 1 + 1.25% )^n
$6,000 = $4,000 x ( 1.0125 )^n
$6,000 / $4,000 = ( 1.0125 )^n
1.5 = ( 1.0125 )^n
Log 1.5 = n log 1.0125
n = Log 1.5 / log 1.0125
n = 32.64 months
n = 2.72 years
The cengage learning for the mitigation is the difference between the agreed upon $72000 less what was earned from the $25000 position that barton managed to obtain
<u>Explanation</u>:
Mitigation of damages:
In the case of barton v. vanhorn a court would consider barton's attempts at findings similar employment a reasonable step in mitigating her damages.
Under the doctrine of damage mitigation, a wrongfully terminated employee must look for other compartable employment, and subtract whatever you make from that job from what you request in damages.
Damages in the case would be the difference between the agreed upon $72000 less what was earned from the $25000 position that barton managed to obtain.
