Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
They are east of the Marshalls if you only need one of the answers here.
Among the choices, participating in a science club after school is the only activity that is not considered an extra-curricular because it still falls under the normal scope of the school curriculum even when the activity is done after class hours.
4. They could have used a hammer with the label progress, and the nail could be labeled opposition??
7. An opponent could alter the steamroller's label with a new label instead of progress put rebel, and instead of the opposition, replace it with humanity. Lol (I believe the opposers are guys)
I am pretty sure that since it flooded often, they needed something to stop all the water from flooding in and ruining all their crop. And there we have it, canals were invented.
