Answer: Consumer price index
Explanation: A Consumer Price Index measures changes in the price level of a weighted average market basket of consumer goods and services purchased by households. The CPI is a statistical estimate constructed using the prices of a sample of representative items whose prices are collected periodically
Answer:
1. My co-worker has indeed done something unethical as it goes against the ethics of the financial profession. By ignoring the outstanding loan that the applicant has with his parents in his risk assessment of the applicant, he has opened the company to more risk exposure that could be costly to the company. My co-worker has therefore been derelict in his duty for whatever reason and engaged in unethical conduct.
2. As this is my co-worker and friend, I would not think to get him in trouble as a first resort by reporting to our immediate manager. Rather I will go an discuss with him to make him see the error in what he just did because it might have been a mistake.
I will advise him to call the applicant back and reduce the available financing. On the off chance he refuses, I would be forced to report him to our supervisor/ manager.
Answer:
either B or C but I am going with C
Explanation:
I mean, Legal services, you are a lawyer or equal to that job.
Answer:
A. Yes. Implicit contract
B. No he cannot
Explanation:
A. From what happened there seemed to be an implied contract between these two people. Although this contract was not done formally, given past situations, an implied contract was formed over time. Hoff felt hawley had dropped the car off for repair given that he usually did this. Hawley cannot make a case that he was going to fix it himself.
B. Hoff cannot recover for the carburetor or fender because the question did not say hawley asked him to do so. If he did it without consent then there is no recovery.
Answer:
The Supreme court will revise the ruling from the Federal Court
Explanation:
When the Atomic Energy Commission appeals to the Supreme Court due to dissatisfaction from the Federal court's verdict, it is the duty of the supreme court to take some moment to look critically into the issue and weigh the premises in which the Federal Court's verdict was passed in favour of the environmental group.
After taking a critical look at the various arguments raised by the environmentalist and the court's ruling, it is obligatory for the Supreme court to decisively call the attention of AEC to the reasons raised and make provision to address such , bearing in mind that there was no previous discussion between the two parties prior to seeking court's attention in this regards.
