Answer:
1.) The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.
2.) With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.
3.) The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.
i think the aswer is (A) <span>Checks are the most widely accepted form of payment.</span>
When retained earnings are not enough to meet their long-term funding needs, businesses may be able to raise funds by <u>selling common stock</u>. Long-term funding can be defined as any financial tool with maturity going beyond one year (such as bank loans, bonds, leasing and other forms of debt finance), and public and private equity instruments.
<h3>What is a retained earnings?</h3>
Retained earnings are the total of profit an establishment has left over after paying all its direct costs, indirect costs, income taxes and its dividends to shareholders.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above
learn more about retained earnings: brainly.com/question/25631040
#SPJ1
Answer: D. The investor has no tax liability on distributions received, and the investment company has no tax liability on retained income
Explanation:
Municipal Securities are exempt of Federal taxes and this is what makes them most attractive. An investor in a mutual fund which invests solely in municipal securities will therefore not have any tax liability because their returns would be based on securities that are federally tax exempt. The same goes for any income the Mutual fund intends to retain.
Because the banks were down
