Answer:
B) No fallacy.
Explanation:
In this example, the speaker is using the authority of Professor Stevens as a way to justify the claim he is making. This is an appeal to authority, and there is no consensus as to whether this is a valid claim or a fallacy. Some authors consider this a valid claim, as the authority is a legitimate expert in the subject. Other authors consider it a fallacy, and it receives the name of <em>argumentum ad verecundiam</em>. This is based on the idea that even an expert can be wrong, and therefore, this is not an appropriate source of evidence.
This is an example of
<u> "an urban legend".</u>
A urban legend refers to a type of modern folklore, It for the most part comprises of fictional stories, frequently exhibited as valid, with grotesque or amusing components, established in neighborhood pop culture. These legends can be utilized for amusement purposes, and additionally semi-genuine clarifications for irregular occasions, for example, vanishings and interesting articles.
Urban legends are spread by any media, including daily papers, email and online life. Some urban legends have gone during that time with just minor changes to suit local varieties.
The presidents salary is $400,000 us dollars plus benefits.
Answer: the georgia general assembly immediately implented it
Explanation: