Government regulation protects constitutional rights, safety, and fairness. Option A is correct.
A mixed economy:
protects private property
allows the free market and the laws of supply and demand to determine prices
allows the government to own key industries.
A mixed economy is defined as an economic system mixing elements of market economies with elements of planned economies, free markets with state interventionism, or private enterprise with public enterprise.
Answer:
the moon orbits the Earth while the earth rotates and orbits around the Sun
Explanation:
Answer:
Inductive approach
Explanation:
The inductive approach is the approach of research in which a person chooses his/her interesting topic for further research. He/she collect the data for research. When the researcher collects the data, then the researcher took breather data from data collection.
A birds-eye has been taken on a collection of data. The researcher will take a look at data and try to develop theory related research and will explain it.
When any of the research takes a look at this pattern, the researcher will observe the set of rules and reached a general idea of the proposition about the experience during research. Researchers transform from data collection to theory development. This approach is based on specific to general ideas.
The real reason for maintaining armies is the same reason why some men buy expensive sports cars... overcompensating.
Seriously, think of armies as insurance. Even if it's small, amateurish, and under-funded, it's likely to give potential bullies a little pause. (Of course, a big country like Iraq can sweep up a little country like Kuwait in no time flat, as we all know).
Part of the answer is social/ economic/ political inertia. The military is part of the playground for the elite and privileged. (I use the word playground as in "fork over your lunch money, weakling.") Who wants to get rid of their army just to balance the budget? I sure haven´t seen "fire soldier-boys" on any IMF or World Bank wish lists
A lot of countries, fragile democracies, say, find armies to be an effective tool to use on internal "problems." In a pinch, a loyal military can keep your nation away from chaos. On the other hand, they work equally well to keep dictators in power.
<span>Many countries do get a lot more mileage out of their armies than Iceland or Costa Rica could possibly get. Obviously, a lot of African countries find them pretty handy.
</span>
Also, keep this quote in mind
<span>"It takes two countries to maintain peace and only one to make war"</span>
