<em>The options are:</em>
a. Change behavior
b. Positive deconfirmation
c. Negative mouth to mouth
d. Confirmatory bias
Answer:
The correct answer is c) Negative mouth to mouth.
Explanation:
When talking about the negative mouth to mouth, reference is made to the information that is transferred from one person to another about the quality of a product, the negative mouth to mouth is when a customer complains about the conditions of the product obtained in the store.
This can damage the credibility of the company that receives criticism and can influence the decisions of potential buyers.
As it is in the case of Matt is dissatisfied with the product he bought, every time he tells his story, he will give his opinion of considering other brands, managing to consciously and unconsciously influence the person so as not to buy in that store.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
are you talking about the game?
Explanation:
Kaiser William II continued a few of them by adding social welfare programs, built up army and navy and Bismarck’s foreign policy was neglected
Explanation:
Bismarck was a Prussian office-bearer and also long served head of government of the German empire. He was successful in maintaining a peaceful foreign policy with Europe for two decades but his domestic policies were less popular. After William II Kaiser was formally coroneted to be the monarch of German empire, he asked old chancellor, Bismarck to step down from the office which led to his down fall.
William II who was young and an ambitious monarch clutched the reins of the German foreign policy. He was considered to be a great king but not a skilled politician. William II considered Bismarck Foreign policies to be of a little value and adopted more aggressive and dynamic foreign policies in order to capture the attention of world politics.
Answer:Slippery Slope fallacies
Explanation:
Slippery Slope: a slippery slope is based on rejecting a series of action without sufficient evidence or with no evidence that they will cause a series of unfortunate or undesirable ends.
So one accepts before something happens that particular actions or situations are bound to create a very prolematic future. One accepts that the future is doomed without even evidence that these recent series of action will bring that.
"The more people that come here, the more our government will have to provide for them. The more our government doles out, the further in debt our nation will become, and this means the higher our taxes will become! The next thing we will find is that our economy will be in just as poor a condition as the one from which these immigrants came! These are the events that has not been fully proven but there at assumptions that as they are listed they may cause a very negative outcome.
