I think net neutrality should be kept! Removing net neutrality is unfair for all those who use the Internet! I think life would change is net neutrality did. Certain websites (a lot!) would slow down and cause a lot of people inconvenience, and I bet we'd have to pay more to use some sites!!!
NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD BE PRESERVED!!!!
Answer: infared types like the sun, sun light, heat lamps, and radiators
The exercise is about filling in the gaps and is related to the History of the ARPANET.
<h3>
What is the History of the ARPANET?</h3>
From the text:
In 1972, earlier designers built the <u>ARPANET </u>connecting major universities. They broke communication into smaller chunks, or <u>packets </u>and sent them on a first-come, first-serve basis. The limit to the number of bytes of data that can be moved is called line capacity, or <u>bandwidth</u>.
When a network is met its capacity the user experiences <u>unwanted pauses</u>. When the network is "slowing down", what is happening is users are waiting for their packet to leave the <u>queue</u>.
To make the queues smaller, developers created <u>mixed </u>packets to move <u>simultaneously</u>.
Learn more about the ARPANET at:
brainly.com/question/16433876
The correct answer is true.
Answer:
D. Zero-day
Explanation:
It is clearly stated that the antivirus is still up-to-date on the workstation, and there has been no alterations to the firewall. Hence, this means the software is functional and up-to-date with all known viruses. This shows that this attack is unknown to the manufacturer of the antivirus software and hence no virus definition or patch fixing this problem has been developed yet. In this light, it is a zero-day.
A zero-day is a type of vulnerability in a software that is not yet known to the vendor or manufacturer, hence this security hole makes the software vulnerable to attackers or hacker before it is been fixed.
