Answer:
See the argument below
Step-by-step explanation:
I will give the argument in symbolic form, using rules of inference.
First, let's conclude c.
(1)⇒a by simplification of conjunction
a⇒¬(¬a) by double negation
¬(¬a)∧(2)⇒¬(¬c) by Modus tollens
¬(¬c)⇒c by double negation
Now, the premise (5) is equivalent to ¬d∧¬h which is one of De Morgan's laws. From simplification, we conclude ¬h. We also concluded c before, then by adjunction, we conclude c∧¬h.
An alternative approach to De Morgan's law is the following:
By contradiction proof, assume h is true.
h⇒d∨h by addition
(5)∧(d∨h)⇒¬(d∨h)∧(d∨h), a contradiction. Hence we conclude ¬h.
The answer is 14 because a negative number multiplied by another negative number is positive. So (-7)*(-2) is 14.
Answer:
Given statement is TRUE.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that line segment JK and LM are parallel. From picture we see that LK is transversal line.
We know that corresponding angles formed by transversal line are congruent.
Hence ∠JKL = ∠ MLK ...(i)
Now consider triangles JKL and MLK
JK = LM {Given}
∠JKL = ∠ MLK { Using (i) }
KL = KL {common sides}
Hence by SAS property of congruency of triangles, ΔJKL and ΔMLK are congruent.
Hence given statement is TRUE.
Answer:
(the second option)
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helps!
