Mr. Wright killed the bird his wife so loved. She was very lonely, but she found some joy, some relief from the "stillness," in the form of a little bird. It was a bright spot in her dark existence, and John Wright killed it, as he killed every other good thing in her life.In killing the bird, Wright killed Minnie's happiness.In many respects, the bird can represent so much in terms of individual voice and identity.For Mrs. Wright, the killing of the bird represents the ultimate in the attempt for male dominance over women. The bird's death reflects that the encroaching male patriarchy won't be content until it controls every single aspect of all existence. If the bird can be seen as women's voices and role in the time period, then the containment or silence of the caged bird is one aspect of being in the world.<span>Yet, with its death, there is almost a statement that men won't be happy unless women are completely subjugated to them. </span>
“snow, and” is the correct answer
A journalist must cite any information they use form another source.
I hope this is the answer you were looking for :)
The correct answers are "Only a small fraction is securely encrypted; the remainder is poorly encrypted" and "Anybody can get their hands on more information".
It is true that not all of the internet traffic is protected. About 60% of this traffic is encrypted; the rest remains a work in progress. This puts uncovered information at the risk of getting collected by able computer security technicians.
With the increasing availability of tools to simulate firewall security breaches, free to download from the internet, anybody who takes the time to learn these practices is capable of compromising unencrypted information - or even encrypted, depending on their skill.
The other options are not to be considered supportive of the central idea since:
The quantity of internet users is irrelevant to the fact that whether the current amount of information is at risk or not. The precautions these users take when browsing the web however, are a more contributing fact to the idea.
Most people do not take adequate precautions when it comes to their privacy, evidence being that the amount of personal data submitted to social networks allows their administrators to take advantage of it, selling the information to advertisers and ensuring a multi-millionaire income.
