You have one mistake which occurs when you integrate . The antiderivative of this is not in terms of . Instead, letting (or , if you want to bother with more signs) gives , making the indefinite integral equality
and then compute the definite integral from there.
Or, starting from the beginning, you could also have found it slightly more convenient to combine the substitutions in one fell swoop by letting . Then , and the integral becomes
Another way to do this is to notice that the integrand's denominator can be factorized.
So,
There are no discontinuities to worry about since you're integrate over , so you can proceed with integrating straightaway.
Just goes to show there's often more than one way to skin a cat...
Given : A standard American Eskimo dog has a mean weight of 30 pounds with a standard deviation of 2 pounds. Assuming the weights of standard Eskimo dogs are normally distributed.
To find : What range of weights would 99.7% of the dogs have?
Solution :
The range of 99.7% will lie between the mean ± 3 standard deviations.
We have given,
Mean weight of Eskimo dogs is
Standard deviation of Eskimo dogs is
The range of weights would 99.7% of the dogs have,
Therefore, The range is approximately, 24 - 36 pounds.