You have one mistake which occurs when you integrate . The antiderivative of this is not in terms of . Instead, letting (or , if you want to bother with more signs) gives , making the indefinite integral equality
and then compute the definite integral from there.
Or, starting from the beginning, you could also have found it slightly more convenient to combine the substitutions in one fell swoop by letting . Then , and the integral becomes
Another way to do this is to notice that the integrand's denominator can be factorized.
So,
There are no discontinuities to worry about since you're integrate over , so you can proceed with integrating straightaway.
Just goes to show there's often more than one way to skin a cat...
if you increase by 4%, it means you will have a new total of 104%. In decimals it is 1.04 (divide your percentage by 100) after that you do the same with the 3% increase. you'll have a new total of 103%. In decimals 1.03. If you want to know what single multiplier you can use, you need to multiply the both decimals. So you get 1.04 x 1.03 = 1.0712