a) The tears of the goddess Isis
The correct answer would be, Cross-training program.
Each project team member had a back up that could fill in at a moment's notice should another team member fall by the way side. The project was able to mitigate risks in this fashion. Thanks to an aggressive Cross-training program.
Explanation:
A Cross Training Program is basically a program for employees in an organization in which employees are trained to perform tasks that are not in their own job description.
These training are done to build the skill sets and to ensure the coverage of key job responsibilities.
This approach of cross training is very useful in minimizing the risk as this training equip employees to do tasks that are not their own job but due to such training, they are able to perform the other tasks in emergency situations and thus are highly useful in risk management.
For example if there is a task which is to be completed by an employee in the coming week and the employee falls sick, then because some other employee is trained to do the task, that task won't be suffered an will be done on time by the back up employee.
Learn more about Cross Training Programs at:
brainly.com/question/11959276
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
Three Examples of the Checks and Balances System. First, the legislative branch can pass a law. The way the executive branch checks that is by either agreeing with it or vetoing it. Second, the judicial branch apprehends the laws.
Explanation:
Checks and Balances. The Constitution divided the Government into three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. ... Just like the phrase sounds, the point of checks and balances was to make sure no one branch would be able to control too much power, and it created a separation of powers.
The modern evolutionary synthesis leaves unresolved some of the most fundamental, long-standing questions in evolutionary biology: What is the role of sex in evolution? How does complex adaptation evolve? How can selection operate effectively on genetic interactions? More recently, the molecular biology and genomics revolutions have raised a host of critical new questions, through empirical findings that the modern synthesis fails to explain: for example, the discovery of de novo<span> genes; the immense constructive role of transposable elements in evolution; genetic variance and biochemical activity that go far beyond what traditional natural selection can maintain; perplexing cases of molecular parallelism; and more.</span>
