Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Sorry if I am wrong
it is kinda confusing
Answer:
0.1111
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that you roll two dice.
the average of the high and low roll is exactly 3,
Since die can show only 1 to 6 we can say average can be 3 in each of the following case.
(1,5) (2,4) (3,3) (4,2) (5,1)
There cannot be any other combination to get average of 3.
Thus favourable events = 4
Sample space will have
(1,1)...(1,6)
(2,1)....
(6,1)...(6,6) i.e. 36
So probability that the average of the high and low roll is exactly 3
=
Try this way:
Note,
1. that 16/2=8 it means 10/2=5.
2. that 10*3=30, it means 16*3=48
Finally for whole table:
================
forks: 16 8 48
================
spoons: 10 5 30
================
Answer:
Based on expert opinion the regression does not suffer from omitted variable bias
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>Based on expert opinion the regression does not suffer from omitted variable bias </em>because its indicators taking values of 1 and 0 where 1 would represent taking action by the legal system and 0 would represent not taking action by the legal system. as
The researcher plans to regress national income per capita based on the effect of the legal system
applying the formula for addressing omitted variable bias ( attached below )
Answer:
V≈146.57ft^3
Step-by-step explanation:
V=πr^2·h/3 since d is 14.4, we would divide it by 2 to find the radius which is 7.2
so V= π(7.2)^2· (2.7)/3
V≈146.57ft^3
It would be greatly appreciated if you gave me the brainlest