Answer:
The value is not close to 0.3 because of sampling variability.
Step-by-step explanation:
The group of answer choices are not given which are as follows:
- All of the above
- Because the sample size is too small
- Because of sampling variability
- Because of nonresponse bias
From this the correct option is option C which is Because of Sampling Variability.
This is true because the two populations are of different values and thus the sample is not dependent on any one of the two possibilities. When a sample of 4 is considered from first and 400 from the second the overall probability will be far from the value of 0.3. So the
Answer:
i think its a
Step-by-step explanation:
4 2/3 divided by 2 3/6 divided with a calculator as a decimal would be 1.86666666667
Answer:
* 1998 and 2001 had the most precipitation.
* The best years for survival were 1998 and 2001.
* One reason would be that precipitation rates are connected to plants as well. Fawns are herbivores, meaning they eat plants, so if the plants are well nourished by rain and growing, fawns will have plenty to eat. Sorry that I don’t know the second reason the two factors are connected.
* Fawns would most likely go extinct if the precipitation rate continues to go down.
Step-by-step explanation:
