Wendy claims that the right mix of hamburgers and other goods is being produced, but that they are not being produced in the least costly way. Economist assess it in the way of allocative efficiency as well as the productive efficiency.
According to Wendy, allocative efficiency is achieved because the right mix of hamburger is produced, but at the same time productive efficiency is not achieved because the production is not utilizing cheapest possible means of producing the goods.
Allocative efficiency occurs when the consumer demand is completely met by the supply. In the other words, businesses are providing the exact supply which the consumers want.
Allocative efficiency occurs from the producers side as well as the consumers side. This happens when the demand is fully met, and production is optimized until marginal costs = marginal revenue . It means that no more profits are made.
Productive efficiency occurs when the businesses focuses on producing a good at the lowest possible cost.
To know more about allocative efficiency here:
brainly.com/question/23879464
#SPJ4
Answer:
equilibrium price
Explanation:
At the equilibrium point, the market does not experience a shortage or excess in either demand or supply. The quantity demanded matches the quantity supplied. The equilibrium price is the price at the equilibrium point where demand and supply meet.
Because there are no shortages or excesses at the equilibrium point, suppliers will sell all their products if they set a selling price equal to the equilibrium price. Buyers will purchase all the quantities supplied at the equilibrium price.
<span>A firm might lose its sales revenue and market share if it is unable to respond rivals market strategy to acquire market share. In the given case most probably the firm lost its market share to its rival due to their exerted efforts in one or more. </span>
Answer:
The correct answer is The fundamental attribution error.
Explanation:
The Fundamental Attribution Error (EFA) is a phenomenon that occurs when we try to explain our own behavior with respect to that of others. Many times we find it hard to understand why a person acts as he acts. And we do not stop to look for the reasons that are the basis of their behavior.
A very clear example is to suspend an exam. If you have to explain to someone why you have suspended the exam, you probably mean that it was very difficult, that you had not rested, did not have time to study or even that the teacher suspended you.
Now imagine that it is another person who suspends and you have approved. Surely if you have to explain why you have suspended you will explain that it is a bit vague, that you have not studied enough and even that you were not interested in approving.
Answer:
The correct answer is indirect bankruptcy costs.
Explanation:
Indirect costs are considered to be damage to the image and reputation of the company, lost investment opportunities, credit restrictions, conflicts with suppliers, loss of sales, conflicts with workers. Indirect costs are usually much higher than direct costs.