Answer:
The frustration-aggression hypothesis
Explanation:
The frustration-aggression hypothesis is a psychological social theory. It explains the origin of aggression from frustration. This hypothesis is used in scapegoat and hate crime. The frustration occurs when the source of the economy gets down. This hypothesis was developed by John Dollar ed at Yale University.
The aggression is always projected on small groups of people which is called the scapegoat. Frustration always leads to aggression in a person. Thus here in the above context when Sam interrupted Paul several times he got frustrated. At last, he turns his frustration into aggression. When Sam enters the room he threatens him for punching on his face and will beat him hard. This is the example of frustration-aggression theory.
The answer is the 3rd choice They want to get one of their memebers elected to a Government office
This scenario reflects the <u>"sexual orientation"</u> privilege that Michelle does not enjoy.
Sexual orientation is one of the less unmistakable parts of a man and therefore we may not realize that somebody we are collaborating with is gay, lesbian, or promiscuous. Due to the marks of shame joined to having a sexual introduction that is other than hetero, many decide not to share their sexual personality in our way of life. Alongside fear for individual security and separation in lodging and work, the way that in a few states same sex sexual movement is illicit keeps people sequestered from everything.
I believe the answer is: controlling ideas
Controlling ideas refers to influencing the general perception that held by other people. This action is most commonly done by monarchies in order to gain support from the citizens to do a certain action.
It also often used to subsequently send a message that government/nobles have higher status in that society that granted them more rights to influence their society.
So slavery and trapping of other tribes was already a thing in Africa before slavery went to the U.S. Because the U.S started doing it, tribes now wanted to enslave as many people as they could to get money from trades that would se d slaves over. This meant tribes fell apart, cultures were lost, and people were hunted down to sell as slaves.
