Answer:
107
Step-by-step explanation:
5x + 3 + 7x + 9 = 180
12x + 12 = 180
12x = 168
x = 14
7(14) + 9 = 107
3*4*3-2*4^2 = 36-32 = 4
hope helped
Answer:
376.991 cm²
Step-by-step explanation:
Surface Area = 2π(5²) + 2π(5)(7)
= 50π + 70π
= 120π
= 376.9911184... ≈ 376.991
<h2>Derive Surface Area of A Cylinder</h2>
If you take a look at a net of a cylinder, you can see it is composed of two circles(bases) and a rectangular strip with the length of the diameter of the circle
The formula for the area of a circle = πr², and since there are 2, it is 2πr²
The formula for circumference of a circle = 2πr, and since we are multiplying that by the height by the height of the cylinder, it is 2πrh
∴ 2πr² + 2πrh
Answer:
Technician B
Step-by-step explanation:
It is very important that any car is taking for a test drive and a road test is carried out to check for any sort of problem with the transmission of the car or any leakages that may be found in the hydraulic circuits.
Technician B is very correct because when the hydraulic circuits is leaking, the front or forward clutch tends to slip thereby causing the shift for all forward gears to be delayed
Also,the sticking of the spool into the body of the valve can also cause the problem to occur as well.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
Step-by-step explanation:
This inequality can be resolved to a compound inequality:
-7 ≤ (3x -5)/2 ≤ 7
Multiply all parts by 2.
-14 ≤ 3x -5 ≤ 14
Add 5 to all parts.
-9 ≤ 3x ≤ 19
Divide all parts by 3.
-3 ≤ x ≤ 19/3
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
If you subtract 7 from both sides of the given inequality, it becomes ...
|(3x -5)/2| -7 ≤ 0
Then you're looking for the values of x that bound the region where the graph is below the x-axis. Those are shown in the attachment. For graphing purposes, I find this comparison to zero works well.
__
For an algebraic solution, I like the compound inequality method shown above. That only works well when the inequality is of the form ...
|f(x)| < (some number) . . . . or ≤
If the inequality symbol points away from the absolute value expression, or if the (some number) expression involves the variable, then it is probably better to write the inequality in two parts with appropriate domain specifications:
|f(x)| > g(x) ⇒ f(x) > g(x) for f(x) > 0; or -f(x) > g(x) for f(x) < 0
Any solutions to these inequalities must respect their domains.