Which of the following is an arithmetic sequence? A.-2, 4, -6, 8, ... B.2, 4, 8, 16, ... C.-8, -6, -4, -2, ...
castortr0y [4]
Answer:
C. -8, -6, -4, -2, ...
Step-by-step explanation:
An arithmetic sequence increases by the same amount every time through addition or subtraction. There is a common difference.
A: -2, 4, -6, 8, ... If there were a common difference, the numbers would not switch between being positive and back to negative. The numbers would either keep going positive or keep going negative.
B: 2, 4, 8, 16, ... The common difference between 16 and 8 is 16 - 8 = 8. The difference between 8 and 4 is 8 - 4 = 4. Since the difference changes between the numbers, this is not an arithmetic sequence.
C. -8, -6, -4, -2, ... The common difference between -2 and -4 is -2 - (-4) = -2 + 4 = 2. The difference between -4 and -6 is -4 - (-6) = -4 + 6 = 2. The difference between -6 and -8 is -6 - (-8) = -6 + 8 = 2. Since the common difference is always two, this is an arithmetic sequence.
Hope this helps!
To qualify as a polynomial, the expression in question:
* Consists of one or more terms * Variables are only with positive whole exponents* No variables in the denominator of any term (the coefficients however, can be fractions.)In that case the answer is most likely:
V=LWH
h=10
V=360
360=LW10
divide both sides by 10
36=LW
try some values
ok so if we get L=1 and W=36, that is the same box as L=36 and W=1
so
L,W
36,1
18,2
12,3
9,4
6,6
5 of them
answer is 5 different boxes
dunno what the 'compare volume' is
Answer:
When the Supreme Court rules on a constitutional issue, that judgment is virtually final; its decisions can be altered only by the rarely used procedure of constitutional amendment or by a new ruling of the Court. However, when the Court interprets a statute, new legislative action can be taken.
Answer:
I think the question is not correct because it can't be factorize
Step-by-step explanation:
