The answer is cccccccccccccccccccccccccc
The graph that represents possible functions is shown in the diagram below. Point C shows the point on y-axis where f(x) and g(x) crosses. The result should be interpreted by the level of steepness of each slope
g(x) has a steeper gradient than f(x) and this indicates steeper fee rise for producing the T-shirt. So if Marissa is to choose the better value for her money to produce T-shirt, she should choose the function f(x) providing there are no other factors to consider other than prices.
Answer:
They earned $9.60 they will each get $4.80. Give or take.
Step-by-step explanation:
9.60÷2=4.80
<em>I am against people doing this.</em>
<em>I think it's wrong because for some reason scientists are permitted to do this but that is breaking the law. I hate how they do it because these are just innocent animals that did nothing wrong to us, our scientists just decide it's ok to go stick needles in them and put stuff on them. My biggest problem with this is that they don't care about the effects their products have on innocent animals and instead of fixing their mistake and just apply it to humans, they just keep on going like there's no tomorrow. Animals have done nothing wrong to these people and I think that it's wrong to do so. Also, I don't really think that this proves anything. An animal's skin and fur are different than a human's skin and hair so it would make no sense to test these things on them because it really is guaranteed to give an accurate answer. Animals differ from us in so many ways that you should be able to think that scientists wouldn't harm these lovely creatures, but instead, they do. Why do scientists hurt these animals? I don't want to live in a world with hurt animals, especially when some of them have World Records, like the Sea Otter.</em>
<em>-R3TR0 Z3R0</em>
Answer:
68
Step-by-step explanation:
because 180-44=136
136:2=68 (since TRS=TSR, there is formula)