All categories

3 years ago

Which sociological perspective makes the most sense to you as a means to study society? Why?

Social Studies

2 answers:

NikAS [45]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

functionalist perspective

Explanation:

The functionalist often provides more precise and accounts for what happens today in an ever complex globalized society or societies.

If anyone is to quote Spencer, Durkheim or Parsons, it is easier to see who we are becoming mucuh more interconnected and problems are becoming a matter of everyone. The health of our species is now a challenge seen as a whole.

Functionalism provides the laws that explain how are societies evolving constantly, and how they experience chaos. But still everyone is part of the society, seen as the unit. Every aspect of society matters, the individuals can experience full potential still with the promise of a better social change.

Flura [38]3 years ago

3 0

The functionalist perspective makes the most sense. on the fact the society functions through different groups working together to make sure everything work out. this is what i know , but i was not shown options.

You might be interested in

From an evolutionary standpoint, in order to succeed, why do women seek out men with the highest levels of education and income?

notsponge [240]

In order to succeed, women seek out men with the highest levels of education and income because these men are most likely to succeed. Men with the highest levels of education and income have a better chance at a successful life (if not already successful) that men without. Since the objective is to succeed, women will choose the most successful men in order to gain their success.

7 0

3 years ago

I have two questions and i need help with them pls help quick

tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

32: b

33:a

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Christianity facts need for my work 50 point + Brainliest

11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

Answer/Explanation:

Christianity has its roots in Judaism.

Christians believe in Jesus, a carpenter who began to travel and teach new ideas about Judaism around 30 CE.

He believed that the old laws of Judaism should be replaced by a simple system based on love and kindness.

Christians believe that Jesus was the Messiah, or savior.

Jesus performed miracles, and after people saw the results, they became followers.

He laid his hands on people and could heal them.

Jesus used parables (stories that teach lessons) to link his teachings to people’s everyday lives.

Jesus soon gained a large following.

Jesus was not popular with Jewish leaders.

They did not want him to threaten their power and had the Romans arrest him.

Jesus was crucified at the age of 33.

Christians believe that Jesus rose from the dead and went to heaven three days later.

They saw the Resurrection as a sign that Jesus was the Messiah.

This date, 33 CE, is the beginning of Christianity.

There are about 2.1 billion Christians worldwide.

Christians are divided into many denominations. Examples include Catholicism, Orthodox, and Protestantism.

All denominations of Christians follow the teachings of Jesus.

Christians worship in churches and chapels.

The Bible is the main holy book for Christians.

It consists of:

1. The Old Testament -- contains the Ten Commandments

2. The New Testament -- about Jesus and his teachings

Christmas is the celebration of the birth of Jesus and is observed on December 25th.

Easter celebrates the death and resurrection of Jesus.

~Learn with Lenvy~

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Is Buddhism polyisthetic or monoisthetic?

Tcecarenko [31]

Answer:

It is nether.

Explanation:

because I looked it up on and had others sites too.

5 0

2 years ago

The federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. At times, priori

nalin [4]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.

It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.

However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.

As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.

Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.

It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.

Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.

3 0

3 years ago