False. The contract doesn't necessarily end with payment. there could be warranties,
Answer:
The reason is that the companies believed that they were able to compete against global and domestic rivals.
Explanation:
The reason for companies to be against the protection is that they believed that they didn't need it because they had advantages that allow them to compete against competitors from other countries. However, if the US would have established a protection from imports, the countries of the companies affected by the measure could have established similar restrictions that wouldn't allow these companies to compete in other markets.
Answer:
2.86 Q + 2,170 = overhead cost
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}High&4,200&14,182\\Low&2,300&8,748\\Diference&1,900&5,434\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7DHigh%264%2C200%2614%2C182%5C%5CLow%262%2C300%268%2C748%5C%5CDiference%261%2C900%265%2C434%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
We subtract one activity level from another, the result is telling us that 1,900 units generate 5,434 additional cost
That is variable cost we divide and get the unit variable cost
cost 5434 / Unis 1900 = variable cost 2.86
Next we calcualte the fixed cost on any of both
Total Cost 14182
Variable -12012 (4,200 x 2.86)
Fixed Cost 2170
Total Cost 8748
Variable 6578 ( 2,300 x 2.86)
Fixed Cost 2170
the cost equation would be:
2.86 Q + 2,170 = overhead cost
Answer:
23.07%
Explanation:
For computing the inflation rate first we have to determine the price index for 2011 which is shown below:
Price index for 2011 is
= (market basket of goods and services cost in year 2011) ÷ (market basket of goods and services cost in year 2009) × 100
= ($160) ÷ ($130) × 100
= 123.07%
Now the inflation rate is
= (Price index for 2011 - price index for 2009) ÷ (price index for 2009) × 100
= (123.07 - 100) ÷ (100) × 100
= 23.07%
And, the price index for 2009 is
= ($130) ÷ ($130) × 100
= 100%
Answer:
$6360
Explanation:
Contract value when the trader sold short = 76.98c * 50000 = $38,490
Contract value when he closed out his contract = 64.26c * 50000 = $32,130
Since the trader had sold short, he is speculating that the price of the futures contract will go down. The value of the contract did go down (in the traders favor) so the difference in value when he sold short and when he closed out his contract will be the profit gained in dollars. Please note that the initial futures prices are quoted in cents and would need to be converted to dollars by dividing by 100c i.e. 3,213,000c = $32,130
Therefore the profit made by the trader in dollars is $38,490 - $32.130 = $6360
