Answer:
I think is b.
Explanation:
or d but double check just from background i eliminate a and c
Answer: Incomplete question.
Match the following terms to there definition.
Explanation:
1. Tells whether a company can pay all its current liabilities if they become due immediately - Quick Ratio
2. Measures a company's success in using assets to earn income - Return on Assets
3. The practice of comparing a company with other companies that are similar - Benchmarking
4. Indicates how rapidly inventory is sold - Inventory turnover
5. Shows the proportion of a company's assets that is financed with debt - Debit Ratio
6. Tells the percentage of a stock's market value that the company returns to stockholders annually as dividends - Dividend Yield
7. Measures a business's ability to pay interest on its debt - Interest coverage ratio
8. Measures a company's ability to collect cash from credit customers -
Account Receivable Turnover
<span>National Crime Victimization Survey,Have an wonderful day!
</span>National Crime Victimization Survey Resource GuideAbout NCVS
The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) series, previously called the National Crime Survey (NCS), has been collecting data on personal and household victimization since 1973. An ongoing survey of a nationally representative sample of residential addresses, the NCVS is the primary source of information on the characteristics of criminal victimization and on the number and types of crimes not reported to law enforcement authorities. It provides the largest national forum for victims to describe the impact of crime and characteristics of violent offenders. Twice each year, data are obtained from a nationally representative sample of roughly 49,000 households comprising about 100,000 persons on the frequency, characteristics, and consequences of criminal victimization in the United States. The survey is administered by the U.S. Census Bureau (under the U.S. Department of Commerce) on behalf of the Bureau of Justice Statistics (under the U.S. Department of Justice).
The NCVS was designed with four primary objectives: (1) to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, (2) to estimate the number and types of crimes not reported to the police, (3) to provide uniform measures of selected types of crimes, and (4) to permit comparisons over time and types of areas. The survey categorizes crimes as "personal" or "property." Personal crimes cover rape and sexual attack, robbery, aggravated and simple assault, and purse-snatching/pocket-picking, while property crimes cover burglary, theft, motor vehicle theft, and vandalism. The data from the NCVS survey are particularly useful for calculating crime rates, both aggregated and disaggregated, and for determining changes in crime rates from year to year.
If the required rate of return is 7.2%, no such security shall be purchased.
<h3>What does the required rate of return mean?</h3>
The required rate of return is the expected percentage of returns on investment at the time the investment is made. The required rate of return, in this case, is 7.2%.
The actual returns earned from purchasing the security for $8000 and receiving returns of $3600 are calculated to be around a 3.6% return.
As a result, if the required rate of return on investment is 7.2%, the security should not be purchased.
Read more about the required rate of return here:
brainly.com/question/13987385
#SPJ4
Answer:
First we need to first find the equilibrium quantity and price during normal times.
The equilibrium price in normal times is P=$3 and the equilibrium quantity is 55 bottles.
During the hurricane, the government will set a price ceiling of $3. We can infer from the table that the quantity supplied at P=$3 is 55 bottles while the quantity demanded during hurricane at the price of $3 per bottle is 105 bottles. Hence,
105-55= 50
During a hurricane, there would be a shortage of 50 bottles of water.
If there were no price ceiling, then the equilibrium price would be such that the quantity demanded during hurricane equals the quantity supplied. From the table we can see that the equilibrium price would in that case be P=$5 per bottle where the equilibrium quantity is 85 bottles. With the price ceiling only 55 bottles are available for trading. Now without the price ceiling 85 bottles are available.
Hence consumers would have to pay an additional $2 (=5-3) but they can now buy an additional 30 bottles [=85-55].
Without the antiprice gouging law, consumers would have to pay $2 more than the ceiling price, but they would bv able to buy 30 more bottles of water.
