Answer:
Poor control.
Explanation:
The reason for telling this story is <u>poor control</u>, Kevin lost part of his leg because of it and you are working to improve the care of diabetics. So the impact of Kevin losing part of his leg, is an example of the results of poor control diabetes.
Answer:
The consumer would be in the evaluation of alternatives,
Explanation:
This is explained because he is evaluating the current state of affairs agains his desired-ideal state. Therefore the consumer is evaluating which alternative can fit in the current state of affairs.
Answer: The best answer is C. Usually compared to lion, Andrew Jackson was a very controlling president and was usually compared to a king because of his actions. He vetoed more than the 6 presidents before him combined. A would imply that Jackson let the Native Americans have the land when he did not. B was the opposite of what really happened. C was somewhat close in that the Cherokee did lose the case( not originally but after Jackson repealed it) but they did not ask Jackson for help. He rather forced them out of the land in the Trail of Tears.
Explanation:
Answer:
Verstehen is the principle.
Explanation:
This principle is the basis of sociology and German philosophy when studying about individuals and their actions.
Verstehen is a German word, which means to understand in a deep way and this supposedly is the reason why Sociologists use this method of knowing the individuals and their actions.
plz mark me as brainliest if this helped :)
