<h3>
Answer: A. competition among producers</h3>
==========================================================
Explanation:
Competition reduces prices while also increasing the quality of the product or service. Companies that don't do such things will likely be out of business since the customer can go elsewhere for a better experience. The more competition, the better consumers are off.
In contrast, monopolies are bad for consumers because one company can set the price to whatever they want (to a certain level of course) and the customer has no choice to pay that price. The customer does not have any other option so the company is in full control. This leads to decline in quality because quality is often associated with cost. Safety standards may decline as well. So this is why monopolies are not good for the customer. In cases where there are monopolies, such as with power utilities, it is strongly advised that government regulations are put in place. This way the company doesn't completely exploit the customer.
In short, we can eliminate choice D because it runs counter to choice A.
Choice C can also be eliminated because if you had a decrease in supply, then the price of the product is likely to go up if you hold other factors in check (such as keeping the same level of demand). Higher prices do not benefit consumers unless those consumers had an equal or better wage increase.
A raise in interest rates means that it becomes more expensive to borrow money. For example, a raise in interest rates means that mortgage rates go higher. This negative is slightly counterbalanced with the fact that savings accounts interest rates go up as well. Overall, I think a rise in interest rates means that consumers ultimately pay more, so we can cross choice B off the list as well.
This is how it looks like
Answer:
Option B. 6%
The rule of 72 says that to find the number of years required to double your money at a given interest rate, you just divide the interest rate into 72.
72/12 = 6
Answer: C. Can-do
Explanation: Since Sasha does not have the luxury of training Randall on the job because he does not have the necessary skills, so she needs someone who has the necessary skills to access the job immediately, then Randall is eliminated due to the can-do factor. The can-do factor depends on skills, i.e. whether Randall is capable of doing something that is needed. It does not depends on motivation, character, personality, it simply depends on knowing the skills. So if he has the skills he can do something.
Answer:
If the client has a document describing wishes for care when he/she is no longer able to make decisions.
Explanation:
Hi! The answer to your question would be that, on admission to the hospital, if clients don't have a living will or a durable power of attorney, then they have to provide a sample form to <em>have a document describing wishes for care when he/she is no longer able to make decisions</em>.
