Yes, it is true that the equilibrium theory of social change does not explain widespread social change within or <u>between societies.</u>
<h3>What is the equilibrium theory of social change? </h3>
The <em>equilibrium theory </em>explains the likelihood of the social system to again reach a <u>state of balance</u> when any change occurs in the society. Hence, the internal and external <em>relationship</em> between social elements is maintained.
Therefore, the social changes in different societies could not be measured as the equilibrium measures the social forces of a given society only.
Learn more about social theories here;
brainly.com/question/4123668
The term he used of having to assert that humans have an
inborn mechanism in which they have the capability of mastering language is
called the language acquisition device. This is a tool in which an individual
has that enables them to learn or acquire language that they may be able to
understand them.
The correct answer is the fundamental attribution error.
Fundamental attribution error (FAE) refers to the phenomenon in which we attribute others' behavior to their disposition (personality) and their abilities, intelligence and skills (or their lack thereof), while attributing our own behavior to situational factors outside our control (bad weather, a harsh teacher, an unforeseen event, etc.). An instance of FAE is failing an exam. If we fail an exam we are much more likely to attribute it to situational factors (the exam was unfairly hard, the teacher graded it unfairly, etc.). On the other hand if another person fails an exam we are much more likely to attribute it to factors internal to him or her- he/ she did not study hard enough, he/she is not intelligent and is incompetent.
It gives electrons because they are both oppositely charged