1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vitfil [10]
3 years ago
15

In the cartoon, which individual right is the man on the right trying to protect?

History
2 answers:
Reil [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

right to privacy

Explanation:

because surveillance over everyone to get there opinions would be creepy and could cause people to fight over each others beliefs

Snezhnost [94]3 years ago
5 0
Right to free elections
You might be interested in
Why was Charlemagne rule important
attashe74 [19]

He ruled most of Western Europe from 768-814. And in 800 he was crowned emperor of the romans

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The legislatures in three-fourths of the states can ratify an amendment.<br> O True<br> O False
Yuki888 [10]

Answer:

The answer is true.

Explanation:

Article V (Five) of the Constitution.

8 0
3 years ago
Which option most accurately summarizes the conflicting perspectives that erupted into the conflict known as “Bleeding Kansas”?
Veseljchak [2.6K]

Pro slavery advocates believed slave owners had a right to transport slaves into the territories; antislavery advocates argued that this gave slave holding settlers an unfair advantage over non-slave holding settlers.

Pro slavery advocates argued that the slave status of Kansas should be determined by popular vote; antislavery advocates argued that Kansas should be free because of its location north of the 36° 30' parallel.  

Pro slavery advocates contended that free African Americans in Kansas should not be permitted rights under the state constitution; antislavery advocates argued that the federal constitution took precedence over Kansas’s state constitution.

Pro slavery advocates held that slavery in the state was legal, as established in the Missouri Compromise of 1820; antislavery advocates argued that this legislation was invalidated by the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Dred Scott case.


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
ULUH
OlgaM077 [116]

Answer:

1 day ago — Working hard on Southam sol. Someone softly spoke "Tailand tot, and toil and tol, And yet I'm always broke -Bewept from "The Land of Hope' by.

1 answer  0 votes:  Answer: I am to lazy to readExplanation:so sorry about that but if I was to read I

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What is coins (in history)​
antiseptic1488 [7]

Answer:

UMM money maybe

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did Eastern Europe react to becoming Soviet satellites?
    10·1 answer
  • Nothing is good or bad, but it is<br>our thinking which makes it so.​
    11·1 answer
  • African slavery in America was based on raising cash crops for export. Several crops were raised by slave labor but the outstand
    12·1 answer
  • What argument did women use to win the right to vote ??
    14·1 answer
  • Given what you know about that time period, how do you think the Catholic Church ruled in Galileos case? Why?
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following were terms of the Treaty of Paris?
    9·1 answer
  • Who is this guy?Where he is from
    6·1 answer
  • Who first improved on the Persian political and legal systems established by Cyrus the Great?
    15·2 answers
  • He most important goal of the Schuman Plan was to
    12·1 answer
  • Ano kahulugan suring basa kahulugang batay sa internet​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!