All categories

4 years ago

Write y=(-3/4)x+3 in standard form using integers. Please help:D will fan and medal

1 answer:

3 0

To make all the values integers, that means we need to remove any fractions. The x variable is multiplied by "-3/4." To make it an integer, multiply both sides of the equation by 4. Therefore,
4y = -3x + 12
To check your work, you can divide both sides by 4 and see that -3x/4 = (-3/4)x and 12/4 = 3.

You might be interested in

Need help on this loviesss

aev [14]

Step-by-step explanation:

perimeter of triangle = s + s + s

perimeter of given triangle = 22 + 17 + 14

= 53 cm

therefore, perimeter of given triangle is 53 cm

7 0

3 years ago

Donte is making a pizza. The round pizza pan has a 18 inch diameter. What is the area of the Pizza crust will need to fill up th

Fittoniya [83]

A = pi(r)^2
diameter is 18in, so radius is 9in
= pi(9)^2
A = 254.469 (round is needed)

8 0

4 years ago

An athletic field is a 48 yd-by-96 yd rectangle, with a semicircle at each of the short sides. A running track 20 yd wide surr

MA_775_DIABLO [31]

The distance would be equal to 2 times the longest side of the rectangle plus twice the shortest side multiplied by pi / 2 for the semicircle, that is:

longest side 96 and shortest 48

D = 2 * (96) + 2 * (1/2) * pi * 48

D = 192 + pi * 48

This shorter side, which starts at 48, will expand each time by two more in proportion to 20 of the running track between 8 than the number of divisions, that is, 2 * (20/8) = 5

In other words, there are 8 distances, like this:

D1 = 192 + 3.14 * 48 = 342.72 yd

D2 = 192 + 3.14 * (48 + 5) = 358.42 yd

D3 = 192 + 3.14 * (48 + 10) = 374.12 yd

D4 = 192 + 3.14 * (48 + 15) = 389.82 yd

D5 = 192 + 3.14 * (48 + 20) = 405.52 yd

D6 = 192 + 3.14 * (48 + 25) = 421.22 yd

D7 = 192 + 3.14 * (48 + 30) = 436.92 yd

D8 = 192 + 3.14 * (48 + 35) = 452.62 yd

6 0

3 years ago

Please help. I dont under stand this please explain answers .

Marina86 [1]

Either 75 or 105 would be my answer

6 0

3 years ago

Use a proof by contradiction to show that the square root of 3 is national You may use the following fact: For any integer kirke

Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

1. Let us proof that √3 is an irrational number, using reductio ad absurdum. Assume that $\sqrt{3}=\frac{m}{n}$ where $m$ and $n$ are non negative integers, and the fraction $\frac{m}{n}$ is irreducible, i.e., the numbers $m$ and $n$ have no common factors.

Now, squaring the equality at the beginning we get that

$3=\frac{m^2}{n^2}$ (1)

which is equivalent to $3n^2=m^2$ . From this we can deduce that 3 divides the number $m^2$ , and necessarily 3 must divide $m$ . Thus, $m=3p$ , where $p$ is a non negative integer.

Substituting $m=3p$ into (1), we get

$3= \frac{9p^2}{n^2}$

which is equivalent to

$n^2=3p^2$ .

Thus, 3 divides $n^2$ and necessarily 3 must divide $n$ . Hence, $n=3q$ where $q$ is a non negative integer.

Notice that

$\frac{m}{n} = \frac{3p}{3q} = \frac{p}{q}$ .

The above equality means that the fraction $\frac{m}{n}$ is reducible, what contradicts our initial assumption. So, $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational.

2. Let us prove now that the multiplication of an integer and a rational number is a rational number. So, $r\in\mathbb{Q}$ , which is equivalent to say that $r=\frac{m}{n}$ where $m$ and $n$ are non negative integers. Also, assume that $k\in\mathbb{Z}$ . So, we want to prove that $k\cdot r\in\mathbb{Z}$ . Recall that an integer $k$ can be written as

$k=\frac{k}{1}$ .

Then,

$k\cdot r = \frac{k}{1}\frac{m}{n} = \frac{mk}{n}$ .

Notice that the product $mk$ is an integer. Thus, the fraction $\frac{mk}{n}$ is a rational number. Therefore, $k\cdot r\in\mathbb{Q}$ .

3. Let us prove by reductio ad absurdum that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is an irrational number. So, we have $x$ is irrational and $p\in\mathbb{Q}$ .

Write $q=x+p$ and let us suppose that $q$ is a rational number. So, we get that

$x=q-p$ .

But the subtraction or addition of two rational numbers is rational too. Then, the number $x$ must be rational too, which is a clear contradiction with our hypothesis. Therefore, $x+p$ is irrational.

7 0

4 years ago