Answer:
72%
Step-by-step explanation:
70%+2%=72%
lol ^^
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
An arithmetic sequence that is described by the explicit formula ...
can also be described by the recursive formula ...
Matching parts of the formulas, we see that a1 = 4, d = -7. Putting these values into the explicit formula gives ...
Answer:
Lev is incorrect because (9, 4) is not a solution to the equation.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the equation: 3y - 2x = 19
When we are to check if an ordered pair is a solution to an equation, we substitute the pair in the equation and compare the RHS and LHS.
If they come to be equal then we can say that the given pair is indeed a solution to the equation.
So, here, RHS = 19
LHS = 3(4) - 2(9) = 12 - 18
= -6
19
i.e., LHS ≠ RHS
So, we can say that (x, y) = (9, 4) is not a solution to the given equation.
Answer:
or (depends on what your curriculum requires)
Step-by-step explanation:
This question is asking for how many shares this person can buy when they have $2000 and each share costs $237.68
So how many 237.68s go into 2000? Well 2000 divided by 237.68 is roughly 8.14. However, you can not buy .14 of a share, so you round down to 8 full shares.
Now its time to write the inequality. Lets assign "x" as the amount of shares the character can buy. We know that they can buy as much as 8 shares, but remember that they can actually buy less than that, so anything below 8 shares and 8 shares would be x8, indicating that x, the number of shares, can be 8 and anything less than that.
If you want to be really accurate, you could also add that x0, since you cant buy 0 amount of shares. So then your answer would be , meaning that they can buy between 0 and 8 shares, including 0 and 8
Lmk if this helped, was incorrect, or if you wanted me to clarify anything :)
Answer:
1/12
Step-by-step explanation: