Answer:
A) a defense of the newly written Constitution and D) written by James Madison and Alexander Hamilton.
What is true about the federalist papers is that that they were a defense of the newly written Constitution and they were written by James Madison and Alexander Hamilton.
The Federalist papers were a series of documents written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and Jhon Jay. They appear in some New York's newspapers in 1784 and 1785. In 1877, delegates of every stated joined together in Philadelphia to draft a new Constitution in the Constitutional Convention. The Federalist papers cited the urgency for the new constitution to be ratified. These papers contained the intent of the framers on the importance of the new constitution.
I hope I can help you :)
I believe the answer is: Giving them back.
With current development of technology and social media, we could read from various different sources and easily provided the new knowledge for other people with one single touch.
One positive thing about this is that it make the flow of information become much more easier, but one negative thing about it is that it is really hard to separate which knowledge are true and which are not.
Answer:
o farmers
Explanation:
knights, money lender, and sailors don't make you unhappy
Answer:
Answer:
For example: 1) The the judicial laws and regulations should be updated in the gap of some years in order to prevent the flaws in those laws and regulations. 2) The rules related with the political sectors are also need improvements in order to prevent the core political corruption.
This question refers to the work The Death and Life of Great American Cities (1961) by Jane Jacobs.
In her text, Jacobs argues that having buildings with easy access to the sidewalk and the outside encourages people to be more engaged with the street. In turn, this encourages them to interact with neighbours more often, and to pay attention to what goes on outside. The people watching are the "eyes and ears upon the street," which can help reduce crime and increase the quality of public life.
In the years since the book was published, cities have changed in important ways. However, I do not believe any of these changes affect Jacobs's concept. Cities are more multicultural now. However, Jacobs's ideas could still be applied in that context, and in fact, are likely to encourage the integration of immigrants. Economic inequality is also not a significant issue, as the use of the street and the interaction of neighbours does not necessarily follow economic lines. Finally, the variation of personal behaviours is not a new phenomenon, as people have always have very different behaviours and habits. However, this does not necessarily mean that they cannot interact as neighbours.
