<h3>
Answer: A. competition among producers</h3>
==========================================================
Explanation:
Competition reduces prices while also increasing the quality of the product or service. Companies that don't do such things will likely be out of business since the customer can go elsewhere for a better experience. The more competition, the better consumers are off.
In contrast, monopolies are bad for consumers because one company can set the price to whatever they want (to a certain level of course) and the customer has no choice to pay that price. The customer does not have any other option so the company is in full control. This leads to decline in quality because quality is often associated with cost. Safety standards may decline as well. So this is why monopolies are not good for the customer. In cases where there are monopolies, such as with power utilities, it is strongly advised that government regulations are put in place. This way the company doesn't completely exploit the customer.
In short, we can eliminate choice D because it runs counter to choice A.
Choice C can also be eliminated because if you had a decrease in supply, then the price of the product is likely to go up if you hold other factors in check (such as keeping the same level of demand). Higher prices do not benefit consumers unless those consumers had an equal or better wage increase.
A raise in interest rates means that it becomes more expensive to borrow money. For example, a raise in interest rates means that mortgage rates go higher. This negative is slightly counterbalanced with the fact that savings accounts interest rates go up as well. Overall, I think a rise in interest rates means that consumers ultimately pay more, so we can cross choice B off the list as well.
Nomadic people like mongols, huns, and khitans
Answer:
b. i, and ii only
Explanation:
Soft money is the term for lightly regulated money transactions and financial campaigns. <u>It presents the financial donation which was given to the party, </u>but not for the direct promotion of a certain political candidate. Other than that, the reason for the user can be any that will result in raising the votes.
<u>One of the characteristics of soft money is that it is unregulated and without many restrictions.</u> It is different from the hard money, given for the direct promotion and advertising of the candidate.
Yes, community participation allows youngsters to become empathetic citizens who could potentially preserve similar work once they turn out to be adults. Moreover, youth who supply again to their communities develop leadership capabilities, examine the significance of assisting, and advantage of work experience.
Youth organizations provide opportunities for leadership that young human beings won't get otherwise. Youth worried in groups can receive records on staying secure and healthful from their friends or adults they realize and respect. They then skip on this data to different younger people.
Through active participation, young human beings are empowered to play an essential position in their personal development in addition to in that their communities. The UN has long identified that younger human beings are a prime human resource for development and key dealers for social alternate, financial boom, and technological innovation.
Learn more about innovation here: brainly.com/question/19969274
#SPJ1
I don't know search on Google
