Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
Answer: Respect for persons
Explanation:
Respect for person is the concept which depicts about individual right that any person persist so that they can function according to their autonomy. Through this guideline ,a person can practice their right, exercise and function under their own control and no outside party can govern them.
According to the question, respect for person is the concept that is included in research and study field in ethical terms that permits a person to make their choice and maintain dignity of self as the subject.
Answer:
raising money + bringing attention to the issue, also giving a voice to the victims.
Explanation:
Answer:
1 and 4 one hope this helps
Explanation:
