Answer:
-22.
There will be the decrease in price hence the supply curve shifts to the left.
Explanation:
So, it is given from the question above that the supply function for avocados is Q = 58 + 15p - 20p_f.
The p_f given in the question = $1.10 which is the price given for the fertilizer as it rises that is to say it rises at that amount.
If the price increases by $1.10, then we have a reduction of -( 20 × 1.10) = -22.
Kindly note that the negative sign denotes the reduction in supply. This reduction causes the supply curve to shift to the left.
The diagram for the supply curve Is given in the attached picture.
Tuttle enterprises are considering a project that has the following cash flow and the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) data. The projected net present value is 074.36.
A project's net present value is the sum of the destiny values of the net coin flows compounded at the desired fee of going back minus the net funding. if safety gives a series of coin flows with an NPV of $50,000 and an investor will pay exactly $50,000 for it, then the investor's NPV is $0. It method they'll earn something the cut price charge is on the security.
Net present value or NPV is the sum of the prevailing value of coins inflows and outflows. In other phrases, it's far the distinction between the present values of cash inflows and the prevailing value of cash outflows over a while.net gift cost shows how a lot of money an assignment or investment will advantage or lose in terms of the present-day budget. future coins drift would not carefully mirror the current cash drift of an undertaking because of the impact of factors along with inflation and lost compound hobby so NPV adjusts for this reason.
Learn more about Net present value here:-brainly.com/question/18848923
#SPJ4
Answer:
59% - a)increase - b)decrease
Explanation:
First of all, we should say that the real exchange rate is calculated by multiplying the nominal exchange rate for the price index and then divide it by the price index of the other country. In another language, using this case as the example, the first nominal exchange rate is 50, as you need 50 rupees to buy 1 dollar. So to calculate the real exchange rate you need to multiply 50 by 100 (the price index of USA) and then divide it by 100 (the price index of India). Note that both price indexes are 100, just a coincidence for making easier the question. Result: 50.
Then we calculate the next real exchange rate: multiply 60 (the new nominal exchange rate) by 106 (the new US price index) and divide by 80 (the new India price index). This throws a result of 79,5. We see a 29,5 increase, and 29,5 represents 59% of 50 (the initial real exchange rate).
Then both questions is more common sense than the reading of the results we just calculated. For example, nominal exchange rate changed from 50 to 60, so the people in India will now have to collect 10 more rupees to buy the same dollar. Let's suppose a pair of shoes in USA costs 40 dollars. Before, Indians needed 2000 rupees to buy it. Now they will need 2400 rupees... it will be more expensive. Plus, the prices of USA had gone up 6%, which means the pair of shoes will now cost 42,4 dollars... even more expensive! As products in USA are more expensive, we can expect that India's consumption of American goods will decrease (law of demand).
With the American consumption of Indian goods happens the opposite, the goods in India became cheaper (price index has fallen), and for the Americans, the same dollars they had will buy more rupees when the exchange rate changed to 60.
Answer:
Division A
If Division A agrees to sell the parts to Division B at $18 per unit, the company as a whole will be:
worse off by $30,000 each period.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Production capacity of Division A = 34,000
Selling price per unit to outside customers = $21
Variable cost per unit = $13
Total fixed costs = $105,800
Order from Division B = 10,000
Price that Division B purchases from outside supplier = $18
Selling to Division B instead of selling to outside customers will result in a loss of $3 ($21 - $18) per unit
The total loss = $30,000 ($3 * 10,000)
Answer:
(i) $14,000
(ii) $32,000
(iii) $10,000
Explanation:
Cost of the machine that is recorded in the books of accounts is the total cost incurred to make the machine useful and useable.
Cost for each machine:
= amount paid for the assets + installation costs + renovation cost prior to use.
Therefore,
Cost of Machine A = 11,000 + 500 + 2,500
= $14,000
Cost of Machine B = 30,000 + 1,000 + 1,000
= $32,000
Cost of Machine C = 8000 + 500 + 1500
= $10,000
