Answer:
$135,100
Explanation:
Given :
Cost of purchasing: $140,500
Operating expenses :$80,600
beginning inventory:$12,900
Ending inventory:$18,300
sales revenue :$300,700
Gross profit of the year can be determined by
Cost of purchasing + beginning inventory - Ending inventory
=140,500 + 12,900 -18,300
=$153,400-$18,300
=$135,100
I guess the correct answer is the narrow view, or invisible hand theory
.
The narrow view, or invisible hand theory, holds that producing profit is more important than being socially responsible.
Given:
Cash = $316
Accounts receivable = $687
Accounts payable = $709 (Liabilities)
Inventory = $2,108 (Assets)
Total assets = Cash + Receivables
= 316 + 687 = $1,003
Liabilities = $709
By definition, the quick ratio is
QR = (Assets - Inventory) / Liabilities
= (1003 - 2108)/709
= -1.5585
This means that the gift barn is over-leveraged and struggling to grow.
Answer: -1.56
Answer:
AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery
No No
The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.
The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.
The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.
For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)
Explanation:
