Answer:
A) $1,050,000
Explanation:
Residual income
= Net operating income - (Total assets*Target rate of return)
= 1,250,000 - (20%*1,000,000)
= $1,050,000
Therefore, The division's Residual Income is $1,050,000.
Answer:
a. monopolistic elements in the economy will prevent an immediate sharp fall in prices as a result of decreasing demand
Explanation:
When there is recession the price of the factor goes down and with that, the insufficient demand for a certain good or services is eliminated. The reasoning is that the decrease in prices stimulates demand and adjust the market.
Keynes among other economist consider that unemployment increase during recessions because the nominal wages rate do not fall. As the union and worker do not want to see their wage decrease. Same is applied to prices which makes then inflexible in a downward direction.
While "supply creates its own demand" is "Says's Law" which is rejected in keynes main book "The general theory"
Hece option A is the only one which is true
The answer is discouraged by government
Available Options:
a) The budget helps motivate employees to achieve sales growth and cost-reduction goals.
b) The budget provides managers with a benchmark against which to compare actual results for performance evaluation.
c) The planning required to develop the budget helps managers foresee and avoid potential problems before they occur.
d) All of the above.
Answer:
Option D. All of the above.
Explanation:
The reason is that when budgets are set every personnel in the organization is given a task along with the restriction on the use of excessive resources of the company by generating a standard number of output, which is benefitial to the company and the managers as well.
Furthermore, standard costs are used in budgeting to estimate the costs of the operations of the company which means that the standard cost would be used for actual units to compare the actual results to make meaningful conclusions.
At the end, the main benefit of the budgeting is that it highlights the potential issues in the operating systems of the organization which must be corrected to avoid the same advers outcome in the future.
So all of the statements are correct.
Answer:
Yes Gordon can sue Floors n' Mores for the settlement of the contract keeping in mind that Gordon has made partial completion of the contract. Full payment would be determined based on the completion of the total work in line withe the plans submitted when the contract was signed
Explanation:
In order to understand the scenario in case if Gordon wants to sue Floors n Mores they can only be compensated for the amount of project completion in line to the expectations that matches to Floors n More.
For Example if 75% of the work is in line with the expectation of Floors N More then Gordon should be paid total amount payable multiply by 75%.
Usually in such cases if the contract is fulfilled to certain extent it is preferred to close the contract based on the %age of completion because major reconstruction, buying of fixtures and furniture was executed. Hence major risks and rewards were transferred to Floors n Mores.
