Answer:
$8.31 million and No.
Explanation:
In this question, we have to find out the present value which is shown below:
= $1 + first year value ÷ ( 1 + discount rate) + second year value ÷ ( 1 + discount rate) ^ number of years + third year value ÷ ( 1 + discount rate) ^ number of years
= $1 + $2 million ÷ (1 + 10%) + ($3 million ÷ 1.10)^2 + ($4 million ÷ 1.10)^3
= $1 million + $1.82 million + $2.48 million + $3.01 million
= $8.31 million
No the package would not worth $10 million as its present value is $8.31 million
As long as the rate of return is bigger than the inflation, the value and amount of money will increase and so will the purchasing power: the correct answer is "it will increase".
For example, if you invest 100 dollars, you will receive 108 dollars back, and you'd need 103 dollars to have the same value of money as before - but you have more.
Answer:
par value of the shares issued.
Explanation:
In the case when the corporation issued the capital stock with regard to the service payment so the least & appropriate basis for recording the above transaction would be the par value of the shares issued as it would leads to the excess payment
Therefore according to the given situation the last option is right
Answer:
What is entirely true about this contract is:
The contract is a VALID contract but is also a VOIDABLE contract on the part of Larry but NOT on the part of Sprint.
Explanation:
As a minor, Larry (he was under the age of 18 when he signed the contract with Sprint) lacks the contractual capacity to enter into the contractual relationship with Sprint. But since he has signed the contract in exchange for the purchase of the cell phone, Larry can either honor the deal or void the contract. This is why the contract is said to be valid but voidable at Larry's behest. However, after Larry has turned 18, if he has not done anything to void the contract, then the contract with Sprint can no longer be voided.
