Answer:
400; 800
Explanation:
Contribution:
Product X:
= Selling price - Variable cost
= 100 - 70
= 30,
Product Y:
= Selling price - Variable cost
= 80 - 40
= 40,
Product Z:
= Selling price - Variable cost
= 25 - 20
= 5
Machine hours required :
Product X:
= Machine time per unit × Monthly demand
= 3 × 300
= 900,
Product Y:
= Machine time per unit × Monthly demand
= 2 × 200
= 400,
Product Z:
= Machine time per unit × Monthly demand
= 1 × 500
= 500
Contribution per machine hour:
Product X = Contribution ÷ Machine time per unit
= 30 ÷ 3
= 10,
Product Y = Contribution ÷ Machine time per unit
= 40 ÷ 2
= 20,
Product Z = Contribution ÷ Machine time per unit
= 5 ÷ 1
= 5
It is highest for Y, so produce maximum amount of Y, then X and then Z
Y needs 400 hrs, we are left with 800 hours, so produce 800 hours of X.
pollution
building up in countryside
over population
The percentage increase in the total sales for 2006 is 15% while the increase in sales of the trench coats is 23.3%; therefore the percentage increase in total sales of trench coats is 8.3% faster.
Computation:
1. The total amount of sales for 2006 and 2007:
2. Now, the percentage increase will be determined for the total number of coats and trench coats:
For the total number of coats, the values used will be the total sales of 2006, and total sales of 2007.
For the trench coats the values used will be the sale of trench coats in 2006 and 2007.
3. Now, the net percentage increase in sales due to the trench coats is computed as follows:
Therefore, the correct option is option B. Sales of trench coats increased 8. 3 percentage points faster than total coat sales.
To know more about percentages of increase in sales, refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/45525
Answer:
initial cash flow is 2,929,000
Explanation:
Attached is the table
Answer:
Type 1 decision error cost and Type 2 decision error cost
Explanation:
Type 1 decision error cost has to do with recruiting the wrong candidate or person specification for the job, type 1 error are expensive to the organization and frustrating to the employees. Type 2 decision error cost has to do with the opportunity cost forgone, when the right candidate which could have been hired, was not hired.
The CEO is likely to discover the Type 1 decision error cost
