The major financial change between post ww2 borrowers and borrowers after 1970 was that there were plenty of jobs after World War 2 and the economy was growing at a large extent.
Most of the people believed that their income would not change even though there were plenty of jobs in the economy.
However they all have a constant income from the year 1945 to 1970.
So all the people continued to borrow more and more money by not attending or joining any post war job in the economy.
Banks were also willing to lend more and more money as they were on the way of high earning through more lending but they get closed.
So after the war people continued to increase their loans and debt ratio in the economy of lending due to which it became the period of great depression.
To know more about post war borrowing here:
brainly.com/question/2675965
#SPJ4
Answer: True.
Explanation:
People sometimes have a tendency of doing only what they are told to do or only what they are paid for. This is why most people who progress in a company do so on the basis of having done work that was not in their description, but would have helped the company progress.
It would appear that Marsha's 6 employees are all of the caliber of employees who just do what they are told and nothing more.
For this reason therefore, she would include a stipulation changing the scheme to include careful performance of the other duties before any sales commission can be earned. This way they'll start to do those other things since they are now paid to do so.
Answer:
$200,000
Explanation:
Interest calculation is based on the Principle amount of $2,500,000 borrowed .
Answer:
P(13,2) = 169
Explanation:
We have to calculate the combinations for left and right shoe considering is not the same having a right shoe blue and left red than having a right shoe rend and a left red.
there are 13 pairs from whcih she will take a single pair:
where:
n = number of pair = 13
r = shoes = 2 (one on each foot)
P(13,2) = 169
Answer:
$355 unfavorable
Explanation:
Budgeted supplies cost was [$1,860 + (635 frames x $ 11)] = ($1,860 + $6,985) = $8,845
Actual supplies cost was $9,200, so the variance was = budgeted cost - actual cost = $8,845 - $9,200 = $355 unfavorable
Since the actual supplies cost was higher than the budgeted supplies cost, then the variance must be unfavorable (because more money was spent than expected).
