Some Native American tribes thought by making a partnership with the settlers that they would be able to trade goods with the settlers and bring peace among the colonists and themselves. A short time of peace was brought among them, before fighting broke out.
No, because by taking children away from their families, it destroyed traditional cultures, and aboriginal society.
Tang was militarily powerful while song was comparatively weak. Song dynasty is remembered for its accomplishments in the sphere of its culture. Tang Dynasty was overthrown by the rebels whereas song dynasty experienced the downfall when the Mongols invaded them.
Tang Dynasty influenced military authority over Central Asia which included Korea, Japan and Siberia and central China whereas song dynasty influenced only a part of china but its cultural impact was felt in other nations too. Song Dynasty gave little importance to military power and encouraged Confucian intellectuals for advocacy.
Tang Dynasty allowed many religions to be followed in his rule; they were Buddhism, Islam, Taoism, Christianity, and Judaism. But song Dynasty favored only the teachings of Confucius. Tang Dynasty was known for poetry while song dynasty promoted paintings. Both the dynasties are similar in creating a cultural impact on other nations.
False. The missionaries of charity is still active up to this point. Though in 1990 due to declining health, Mother Teresa asked to resign as head of the missionaries, only to be voted back in as Superior General; and six months before her death, on March 13, she was eventually replaced by Sister Mary Nirmala Joshi, to be succeeded by Sister Mary Prema during a meeting held on 2009.
The heads of this missionary have changed, but it never became defunct during her death.
Hope this answer helps.
Wouldn't it be 'Subject to attack?'
If not, let me know!
