A cost incurred in the past that is not relevant to any current decision is classified as a(n): Sunk costs
This is further explained below.
<h3>What are
Sunk costs?</h3>
Generally, A cost that has already been incurred but cannot be recouped is referred to as a "sunk cost" in economics and the process of making business decisions. In contrast to sunk costs, prospective costs are future expenses that might be avoided if action is done, while sunk costs have already been incurred.
In conclusion, A cost that was incurred in the past but is not relevant to any choice that is being made at this time is considered to be a(n): Incurred expenses
Read more about Sunk costs
brainly.com/question/20438089
#SPJ1
I think it’s B but somebody correct me if I’m
Wrong
Answer:
New target price is $ 180.
Explanation:
This question requires us to calculate the new target price. The detail calculation is given below.
Current price = Full cost + target income
Current price = $ 200 + $ 40
Current price = $ 240-A
New Price = A * (75%)
New price = $ 180
(new price is 75% of current price)
An oligopoly does not exist when there is a lot of variety in the number of sellers and producers of media content.
What is an oligopoly-
An Oligopoly is a type of market in which :
- Few numbers of buyers and sellers.
- High capital cost to entry in the market.
- Similar but slightly different products. (eg. Cold drink companies)
- Entry may be restricted to a few firms
- there can be informal cartels within the existing firms which do not allow others to come in.
- The action of one firm has an effect on the whole market, this will leads to a prisoner's dilemma.
An example of an oligopoly market is - the Organisation of petroleum exporting countries(OPEC).
Disclaimer- The Question is incomplete the question may be "An oligopoly exists when there is a lot of variety in the number of sellers and producers of media content, but not much variety in what they actually produce. Is this statement true or false?"
To learn more about the types of markets please click on the link
brainly.com/question/24877850
#SPJ1
Patents are used to balance the right of the individual with the concept of the public good. In general, the purpose of a patent is two-fold: to allow the inventor of some new thing to retain exclusive rights as to its use for a limited period of time, and after that time to ensure that the details of the invention are available for public use.
By granting the patent-holder exclusive rights to their invention, use and duplication of the invention is at the sole discretion of the inventor, potentially allowing them to profit from it. However, after a period of time those exclusive rights cease to apply, and the new invention becomes available to the public. This contributes to the public good by increasing the amount of general knowledge available.
