Based on the fact that the small group of dissenters did not voice their objections because well-liked members were in favor of the schedule, this is <u>Groupthink</u>.
<h3>What is groupthink?</h3>
This is a phenomenon where people in a group will pick choose a certain decision because they believe that most of the group supports that decision.
They do this even though they may have dissenting views, because they do not want to be left out.
Find out more on groupthink at brainly.com/question/10206116.
Answer: Fundamental Attribution Error
Explanation: Marilyn made this mistake, which many people make, which is that she overemphasised the professor's behaviour, where the cause of such professor's behaviour is his personal reason, often by such people as Marilyn is seen as a "psychological problem" of a personal nature, and not as behaviour for objective, professional reasons. In doing so, Marilyn evaluated the cause of the professor's behaviour solely on the basis of observation of his behaviour, i.e on the basis of perceptual visibility, and not on some additional information that would provide further insight into the professional, therefore not personal, reasons for such behaviour.
Such an assessment of others is also called cognitive bias, so a person's behaviour depends on the "type" of the person, i.e whether the person is strict, old-fashioned, and not on social or objective circumstances, and therefore such an assessment is biased, like Marilyn's assessment of the professor's personality that he is rigorous means that Marilyn's assessment is biased.
Answer:
It took some time for the fourteenth Amendent to secure the civil rights of African Americans and others.
Explanation:
Section 2 of the fourteenth Amendent reduces congressional representation for states that denied suffrage on racial grounds. However this was not enforced until the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
One of the most important social psychological findings concerning race relations is that members of stereotyped groups internalize those stereotypes and thus suffer a wide range of harmful consequences.
Stereotype Threat is the experience of anxiety or concern in a situation where a person has the potential to confirm a negative stereotype about their social group. Since its introduction into the academic literature in 1995, Stereotype Threat has become one of the most widely studied topics in the field of social psychology. First described by social psychologist, Claude Steele and his colleagues, Stereotype Threat has been shown to reduce the performance of individuals who belong to negatively stereotyped groups. If negative stereotypes are present regarding a specific group, they are likely to become anxious about their performance, which in turn may hinder their ability to perform at their maximum level.
Stereotype Threat is a potential contributing factor to long-standing racial and gender gaps in academic performance. However, it may occur whenever an individual’s performance might confirm a negative stereotype. This is because Stereotype Threat is thought to arise from the particular situation rather than from an individual’s personality traits or characteristics. Since most people have at least one social identity which is negatively stereotyped, most people are vulnerable to Stereotype Threat if they encounter a situation in which the stereotype is relevant.
Situational factors that increase Stereotype Threat can include the difficulty of the task, the belief that the task measures their abilities, and the relevance of the negative stereotype to the task. Individuals show higher degrees of Stereotype Threat on tasks they wish to perform well on and when they identify strongly with the stereotyped group. These effects are also increased when they expect discrimination due to their identification with negatively stereotyped group. Repeated experiences of Stereotype Threat can lead to a vicious circle of diminished confidence, poor performance, and loss of interest in the relevant area of achievement.
The opposite of Stereotype Threat is known as Stereotype Enhancement, which entails an individual’s potential to confirm a positive stereotype about their social group, and a subsequent increase in performance ability in the related task as compared to their ability prior to their exposure to the stereotype.
Advocates of Stereotype Threat explanation have been criticized for exaggerating it and for misrepresenting evidence as more conclusive than it is.
They could feel anxiety, panic attacks, and stress. I believe any of these would be a valid answer.
