Option B
If one were somehow able to measure everything that makes up job performance, he or she would be measuring: ultimate criteria
<u>Explanation:</u>
The ultimate criterion resides as a rigorously conceptual construct that cannot be estimated or perceived. To propose it and to explain the association among the consequences esteemed by the team and the worker actions that guide to these consequences.
One of the usual tenacious ideas a determined criterion is lacking is the multidimensionality of the ultimate criterion, which merges latent, active, and unique dimensionality. The ultimate criterion can lead people to the general dominant constancies of their acts. They can support to present a justification for proceeding to give and for driving high-performance levels.
Well someone who isn't enthusiastic and outgoing especially if they like to say things about harming others or themselves, and usually they don't like to participate in group activities.
It's B, the first amendment.
Explanation:
because she had made a great contribution to international peace
