1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Effectus [21]
4 years ago
11

PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!!What are the positions of federalists and anti-federalists when it comes to federal versus state power, t

axation, and position on changing the constitution?
History
1 answer:
dusya [7]4 years ago
4 0

Federalists:

Federalists wanted the country to have a strong Federal government. They thought it was constitutional to directly tax American citizens. Federalists had a broad and loose perception of the Constitution, so they believed that changes could be made without too many conditions.

Anti - Federalists (Democratic - Republicans):

Anti - Federalists wanted a strong state government. Their strict perception did not directly authorize the ability to tax citizens and would only accept changes to the Constitution if absolutely necessary. Anti - Federalists stated a change was necessary at the time because they believed the Constitution gave too much power to central government.

You might be interested in
The assembly called for a "bill of rights" that would list U.S. citizens':
Rudik [331]
I know the answer is Immunities and freedom, but where would that go under here
8 0
3 years ago
Mayan Cities were primarily built around religious temples. Why was this the case?
oksano4ka [1.4K]

Answer:

They built them around their temples because  Mayans built on the irregularly-shaped higher ground to avoid floods and dampness associated with their tropical forest home. In the center of the cities were the important public buildings such as temples, palaces, and the ball coutt

5 0
3 years ago
Based on the information provided in the documents, what did Europeans believe started the plague?
GenaCL600 [577]

They thought the Jewish community had poisoned the water supply.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the effects of salutary neglect? Check all of the boxes that apply. The colonies grew poorer. The colonies could trade
seropon [69]
Firstly, what salutary neglect means is a kind of policy that existed during the <span>early to mid-18th century under the British government for its North American Colonies. The purpose of this policy is to loosen the enforcement of parliament laws in order for their colonies to remain loyal. Therefore, from the given statements above, the effects of this salutary neglect include: </span>The colonists felt more loyalty and gratitude toward Britain. And, t<span>he colonists developed some independence from Britain.</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Read 3 more answers
When did Ireland become a republic
coldgirl [10]
1949 <span>Ireland become a republic</span>
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements best describes the government of Somalia?
    5·2 answers
  • How did the Hongwu Emperor improve life for the peasants?
    10·2 answers
  • What did Alvin York do to receive the Congressional Medal of Honor?
    12·2 answers
  • When a bank loans money to a person or a business, they charge a small fee to make money. What is this fee called?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of Justinian's achievements do you think had the most impact on his empire's greatness
    9·1 answer
  • If you could live in any time and place in the history of the world, when and where would it be and why ?
    7·1 answer
  • Define the term mass production
    8·1 answer
  • The Safavid employed two_________ to help modernize their military.
    13·2 answers
  • Why is perspective especially important for an artist to consider when creating a freestanding sculpture (sculpture-in-the-round
    11·1 answer
  • Who determines the structure and function of tribal government
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!