The Chinese Room Argument was first published in a paper in 1980 by American philosopher John Searle (1932- ). It is a thought experiment in which <span>Searle imagines himself alone in a room following a computer program for responding to Chinese characters slipped under the door. </span><span>
Searle argues that the Chinese room thought experiment shows that n</span><span>o digital computer will ever be able to think.</span>
This is a poor use of the Communication Channel. These are the physical instruments that help in communication such as writing, email or cell phone. This channel facilitates communication, widens it and allows the message to be transmitted more quickly. In this case, the use is poor because the note is very short and this type of messages is better to give them face to face.
Answer:
The correct answer is a. Humphreys used license plate numbers to target their homes and interview the men without disclosing the real subject of his study.
Explanation:
Laud Humphreys (1930-1988) was a sociologist who for his PhD dissertation wrote a study called <em>Tearoom Trade</em> (1968), where he studied the behavior of males who engaged in homosexual sex in public toilets. Humphreys made a series of discoveries, like finding out that most of the men who engaged in these practices were not openly or overtly homosexual, and even a majority of them (54%) were married. However, his research was widely criticized because of how he performed it. Humphreys acted out as a sort of look-out for the men in the toilets, but without disclosing his identity as a researcher. Moreover, <u>Humphreys followed the unwitting subjects of his study to their homes by </u><u>tracking their license plate numbers and interviewed them</u><u>, posing as a government health officer and hiding his true identity as a sociologist conducting research</u>. Lying to subjects and hiding from them that they're part of a study is frowned upon by the scientific community, so the research was widely controversial, and it's still brought up as an example of the ethics of social research.
It's called condensation.
