Of natural rights life,liberty,and property. People had the right to overthrow their government if it wasn't doing its job of preserving people's natural rights.
Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
Answer:
Not at all you can still keep on asking
The answer in the space provided is personality. It is
because these are characteristics that an individual possess that completes his
or her individuality and that this involves of what he or she feels, behaves
and even how he or she views the things around him or her.
