The owner could advertise a sale and try to sell as many pairs of shoes as possible before the recession comes and prices fall even more. Then, when the recession hits a trough, the owner could use the money from this sale to expand the warehouse while costs are at their lowest point. The owner must be sure to plan for falling demand.
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option C. The <span>congressional process that is being described would be its oversight function. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day. Feel free to ask more questions.</span>
The reason that federal courts do not try these cases is because there are already special courts just for these types of cases.
C.1 because it is the only responsible answer
<span> (B) lower labor costs. It's one of the big reasons why a lot of manufacturers build factories elsewhere such as Mexico, China, Southeast Asia, etc.. because the labor costs are so low. Workers there can be hired at far lower costs there than those in nations like the United States.</span>
